Let’s look at the advantages and disadvantages of rental and built-in disk file site

Let’s look at the benefits and drawbacks of rental and built-in webhard.

Rental webharders include Dacom Webhard, Ucloud, and KT Webhard. This identifies a service that shares idc’s server resources with other users.

Built-in webhard solutions include Internet disks, linkhard, plus disks, ncs, and Ajaxplar.

The rental type gets the benefit of having a server on idc, so that it does not have to be managed separately, and the original setting cost is low.

However, you will need to pay monthly maintenance for capacity and traffic, purchase capacity and traffic costs, and move files to other servers.

There are disadvantages such as dual subscription to internal services (homepages, intranet) and other domains.


Built-in Webhard leverages specific hardware (internal resources) to create services, freeing up capacity and traffic.

It has the burden of initial setting costs. Large companies usually do not use rental solutions. Webhard isn’t just a Webhard, it is a company.

It is because it really is confidential and knows the power of strategic sharing and well-managed data.


Link hard solutions have emerged based on the intention that small and medium-sized businesses should build webhard without any burden.
It does not have to purchase H/W separately, and the answer alone allows users to build Webhard by utilizing the desired pc, NAS, and server equipment.
If you already had an internet site or intranet, it is possible to stop unnecessary work that used to run the site.

OK to create installed blogs or bulletin boards.

By increasing utilization through intranet, groupware, kms, and the business’s homepage in addition to the Webhard’s original function, the idea of developing a use-oriented product makes one look forward to the expansion of the solution.

The price can be from 300,000 won for 30 people, which can be fully built in Soho, so the parts that have been agonizing over setting and maintenance costs will undoubtedly be solved a lot.


It is now necessary for Soho to determine a web hard system.

Rental vs. Construction.


Webhard reminds you of a very useful and convenient Internet service that allows you to download files on the internet at a fixed monthly cost. Therefore the use of web hard is becoming common.



But it’s not just lately that this concept arrived, and it’s true that it is been a long time. As soon as it came out, lots of people used it, and there have been many workers in offices who didn’t join it or even paid for their personal expenses due to lack of capacity, and there are probably still some now.



The biggest background of the phenomenon may be the rapidly growing file capacity of materials such as work used, while there are many burdens and inconveniences to pay monthly expenses based on limited capacity. Furthermore, the service is provided against the backdrop of a big portal, which also results in security concerns about the leakage of confidential information, which explains why the company refuses to adopt it.


In some cases, additionally, there are many implementations of SI projects that build installation-only webhard that meet up with the needs of users’ needs. The deployment of a standalone server consists of a server (HW)+ operating system (Server OS)+ webhard solution (high-priced licenses using the number of users), which is prohibitive compared to using monthly webhard when maintenance services are included.



NAS offers a highly cost-effective, easy-to-install and easy-to-operate webhard for anybody with significantly decrease the needs of these webhard users. Webhard is quite innovative because it supports uploading files automagically. It’s a excellent feature because DDNS, etc. can be accessed from the outside without needing to buy an authorized IP.



Unfortunately, you can find functional limitations as the basic webhard contained in these NAS is basic. Because the word “basic” implies, it’s not a webhard solution developed at a high cost. Consequently, webhard modules for NAS mounts are recently available with the capabilities and peaks of expensive, built-in webhard solutions. Of course, it is a paid option, but it’s a very low-cost, very useful solution that’s less than a tenth of the cost of building a single server.


다운로드사이트 Now, NAS and Webhard meet to integrate Intranet & Extranet at low priced, creating a small but powerful collaborative file server. I’ll have a look at the rough features of Webhard and guide you. It is possible to go over it and choose the right one in line with the reality and needs.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *